Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.

[Richard Stallman]

The difference in etc/fns-* is easy to explain.  That file is made
based on load-history, from whichever files were actually loaded.

It would take some work to be able to make the fns file invariant.
How important is it for us to do that?

I can't see an explanation for the variance in cus-load.el.
There is nothing in cus-dep.el or lisp/Makefile.in that ought
to be affected by whether Emacs is built for X.
Can you debug why it doesn't see scroll-bar.el in one case?