Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile

[Sam Steingold]

> * In message <address@hidden>
> * On the subject of "Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile"
> * Sent on Sat, 03 Aug 2002 17:38:33 +0200
> * Honorable Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Since visibility of the work on Guile Emacs seem to be pretty much
> nil, one way to prove that CLISP would be a better way would be to
> simply get a barely working emacs clone running on it and document
> some design considerations and thoughts.  I'm sure it would attract
> people that want to work on it.

I am not so sure about it.

> Can CLISP take advantage of the non-ASCII work that has gone into
> GNOME?  This seems to be one major work item for a Guile port.
> Leveraging on the GNOME work seem to give many modern features easily
> (Unicode, bidi).

CLISP uses Unicode.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running RedHat7.3 GNU/Linux
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.palestine-central.com/links.html>
Linux - find out what you've been missing while you've been rebooting Windows