Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Tak Ota <address@hidden>
> > 
> > In other words, the mere fact of cygwin.dll's existence does not
> > necessarily mean that this Emacs is a Cygwin binary.
> 
> You are right.  For that purpose I think `system-type' should provide
> appropriate distinction between the two.

Yes, that would be my recommendation as well.