[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: INFO on add-ons
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: INFO on add-ons |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Sep 2002 16:03:06 -0400 |
> However, GNU packages are welcome to use any other format you like
> which can be converted automatically into a good Texinfo file.
Does `good' mean `readable', or just `parseable by makeinfo'?
It mostly means parseable by makeinfo and by TeX, but it should not
be too hard for humans to understand.
- Re: INFO on add-ons, (continued)
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Ville Skyttä, 2002/09/04
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Miles Bader, 2002/09/04
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/04
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/05
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Robert J. Chassell, 2002/09/05
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2002/09/05
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/05
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Miles Bader, 2002/09/05
- Re: INFO on add-ons,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/04
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Robert J. Chassell, 2002/09/04
- Re: INFO on add-ons, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/04
Re: INFO on add-ons, David A. Cobb, 2002/09/02
Re: INFO on add-ons, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/02