Re: bug in ielm: patch. Related problem with end-of-line.

[Luc Teirlinck]

>From my previous message:

   So maybe it might be good to revert to the 21.2.90 behavior.

Actually in 21.2.90 C-e moved over the next field and (field-end)
returned the end of the next field (at a field boundary) even if the
previous character did have a rear-sticky field property.  Maybe this
part of the 21.2.90 behavior was incorrect, which may have been why
it got changed.  However, I believe that the old behavior should have
been maintained at the beginning of a buffer or after a character with
a rear-nonsticky field property of any kind.

Sincerely,

Luc.