[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How is the 21.2.90 pretest going?
From: |
Francesco Potorti` |
Subject: |
Re: How is the 21.2.90 pretest going? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:26:40 +0200 |
> workaround. I've just installed it in RC.
>
> 2002-10-08 Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
>
> * international/ucs-tables.el (unify-8859-on-encoding-mode): Set
> :init-value to nil, and calls (unify-8859-on-encoding-mode 1)
> later.
I had just finished writing the same workaround :-)
> One bad result is that, the customize buffer of this
> variable says as this:
>
> Unify 8859 On Encoding Mode: Hide Toggle on (non-nil)
> State: this option has been changed outside the customize buffer.
>
> And, if you click "Erase Customization", the value is reset
> to nil.
>
> Once it is decided that this variable is removed and we
> always enable unify-8859-on-encoding, this problem
> disappears. It disappears also when define-minor-mode or
> eval-after-load is fixed in RC.
Ok. I'll go on with the pretest, then. If somewhere there is a list of
problems with the pretest, the text of your mail should go there.
Probably define-minor-mode should be fixed in RC before releasing 21.3.
I found the following files mentioning a problem with that:
image-file.el
jka-compr.el
minibuf-eldef.el
mwheel.el
recentf.el
- Re: How is the 21.2.90 pretest going?, Francesco Potorti`, 2002/10/08
- Re: How is the 21.2.90 pretest going?, Kenichi Handa, 2002/10/08
- Re: How is the 21.2.90 pretest going?,
Francesco Potorti` <=
- Re: How is the 21.2.90 pretest going?, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/09
- Re: How is the 21.2.90 pretest going?, Francesco Potorti`, 2002/10/09
- Re: How is the 21.2.90 pretest going?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/09
- Re: How is the 21.2.90 pretest going?, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/11
- Re: How is the 21.2.90 pretest going?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/11
Re: How is the 21.2.90 pretest going?, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/09