Re: risky-local-variable-p called with 1 argument

[Kim F. Storm]

Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:

> On 25 Oct 2002 11:41:37 +0200, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) wrote:
> 
> > That change is not recorded in the lisp/ChangeLog, but I found this in
> > the CVS log for lisp/files.el:
> <snip>
> > However, that log message is mis-leading, as the change doesn't define
> > a new function risky-local-variable-p, but rather adds a second
> > mandatory VAL argument to it.
> 
> Yeah, I found that too.
> 
> > And of course, the last part of that message should have rung a bell :-)
> 
> Sure ;-)
> 
> OK, so what's the VAL supposed to be passed to `risky-local-variable-p'?

The value you are about to assign to SYM, afaics...  

I don't see how we can easily get that value for unsafep-variable, but as
a temporary work-around, I think you should just supply an empty string ""
as the arg [the only current use of the VAL argument is to test it with
stringp].

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk