[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: idledo.el v. 0.3
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: idledo.el v. 0.3 |
Date: |
27 Oct 2002 00:51:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Add a new function:
>
> (timer-idle-timer-first-invocation-p TIMER)
>
> which allows an idle-timer action to check whether this is the first
> invocation of the timer after emacs becoming idle, or a repeated
> activation.
>
> Is there an actual need for this, or just a theoretical need? You
> could do it easily enough by setting a flag variable when the timer
> runs, and clearing it using timer-no-longer-idle-hook.
True, it is strictly not needed, since the hook can use a boolean to
know whether it was repeated (or activated at all)... However, since
that information which is already recorded in the timer vector, it
seemed natural (and friendly :-) to give the hook easy access to that
information.
>
> Add a new hooks:
>
> timer-no-longer-idle-hook
>
> [Implementation: Run from the above mentioned pre-command hook.]
>
> This is a useful feature, but why not use pre-command-hook directly?
Because the pre-command-hook is called for all command - also when
emacs hasn't been idle; that seems highly wasteful to me.
I'll make a patch for the proposed features; then you can see how much
of that you want me to install.
- Re: idledo.el v. 0.3, (continued)
Re: idledo.el v. 0.3, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25