[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: suggested new command `picture-mouse-set-point'
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: suggested new command `picture-mouse-set-point' |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:55:06 +0000 (GMT) |
Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> The following patch implements the functionality for `insert-file' and
> `insert-file-literally'.
>
> Before commiting it, three questions/issues:
>
> - I've made it to ask before inserting, instead of blindingly inserting
> *and* issuing a warning. Which way is preferred?
Well, I would prefer -- now that it has found that modified buffer --
if it would offer to insert that buffer's contents instead of the
original file.
Something like:
File XXX is modified in buffer B. Insert anyway [ynb]?
where responding 'b' inserts the buffer's contents.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
Re: suggested new command `picture-mouse-set-point', Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25
Re: suggested new command `picture-mouse-set-point', Richard Stallman, 2002/10/24
Re: suggested new command `picture-mouse-set-point',
Kim F. Storm <=