Re: TODO additions

[Dave Love]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     It may not have canned tests for everything, but I don't think writing
>     tests where necessary and providing explicit info which can't be
>     tested is so difficult.
> 
> That is trivial, since we have already done it.

What's there now is often incorrect, at least as it's used --
e.g. breakage in Solaris and Irix -- or otherwise dubious and
untestable.  I say this after getting far too familiar with it on
multiple platforms.

> Chances are we could easily use Autoconf for more than we do now.
> It does take some work.  If someone wants to do it, that is fine.

I'm pleased that's OK, at least.