[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4...
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4... |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 08:49:12 +0100 |
On Tue, 05 Nov 2002 22:00:09 +0300, "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> wrote:
> That requires a higher degree of control than we have now over what
> changes are installed on the trunk. As long as each change does not
> need to be approved before it's installed, I think we cannot guarantee
> that some new features are postponed.
Well, that's a matter of self-discipline. Perhaps I'm too optimistic,
but I'd think that just asking for no new features to be checked in for
a while should suffice...
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., (continued)
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Kim F. Storm, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Miles Bader, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Francesco Potorti`, 2002/11/07
- (no subject), Kenichi Handa, 2002/11/07
- Re: (no subject), Richard Stallman, 2002/11/08
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Francesco Potorti`, 2002/11/07
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Richard Stallman, 2002/11/09
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4...,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/06
Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/05