[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GTK patches part 1
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: GTK patches part 1 |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Dec 2002 14:23:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.3.50 (ia64-suse-linux) |
"Jan D." <address@hidden> writes:
|> I don't understand why HAVE_GTK needs to be in config.in. Can you
|> explain?
All AC_DEFINE'd symbols must be in config.in. You should use the modern
form of AC_DEFINE, with the comment as the third parameter. The file
src/config.in is supposed to be generated only by autoheader.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- GTK patches part 1, Jan D., 2002/12/08
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Miles Bader, 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Jan D., 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Miles Bader, 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Alan Shutko, 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Jan D., 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Miles Bader, 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Jan D., 2002/12/09