[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:28:51 -0500 |
No argument: local, output treated as usual.
Prefix argument: local, output at point, just like now, except:
2 C-u's : remote, output as usual
3 C-u's: remote, output at point.
I see nothing unacceptable about this. If people are happy with it,
we could do it.
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/02
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/10
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Kai Großjohann, 2003/01/11
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/12
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Kai Großjohann, 2003/01/12
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Andreas Schwab, 2003/01/13
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Ehud Karni, 2003/01/13
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/14
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/01/14
- Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers?,
Richard Stallman <=