Re: "nmake info" Windows patch

[Jason Rumney]

"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:

> I don't mind if we require the Cygwin port of makeinfo (assuming it's
> okay with Jason, Andrew, and other developers who work on the Windows
> port of Emacs), but I think we should at least tell that clearly in
> the docs.

Requiring the cygwin port is not ideal, but it is better than not
having proper make rules to build the info files on Windows.  Since
this only affects people who compile from CVS, we can live with this
until someone has time to make native ports of makeinfo work.