[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of MAC/W32/X consolidation and some questions.
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Status of MAC/W32/X consolidation and some questions. |
Date: |
11 Mar 2003 02:04:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Andrew Choi <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > Also on MAC, there are quite a number of TODO items, meaning that some
> > section of more-or-less unmodified X or W32 code is commented out with
> > #if 0... #endif. In the cases where the code is to be "consolidated",
> > I would prefer to leave a TODO note in the mac* file and simply delete
> > the code from the file. Then in the consolidated code file, I will
> > put a #ifndef MAC_OS around the consolidated code to indicate that it
> > is not used on MAC_OS (yet). Is that an acceptable approach?
>
> Please consider using HAVE_CARBON instead of MAC_OS: some people compile
> Emacs to run under X Window on Mac OS X.
I don't understand the difference between those names -- are you saying
that we should in general use HAVE_CARBON rather than MAC_OS throughout?
For the windows port, there are two defines: WINDOWSNT and HAVE_NTGUI.
The first specifies that we are on a W32 platform, the other that we
are compiling for the W32 GUI.
Are MAC_OS and HAVE_CARBON the Mac equivalent of those?
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
Re: Status of MAC/W32/X consolidation and some questions., Jason Rumney, 2003/03/10
Re: Status of MAC/W32/X consolidation and some questions., Miles Bader, 2003/03/10