[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BUG: which-func-mode
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: BUG: which-func-mode |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Mar 2003 17:37:42 -0500 |
> > I think that it would be better if select-window did not
> > change the buffer-list. Why does it do it in the first place?
> >
> > Because it changes the selected buffer.
>
> I don't understand why one should imply the other.
> After all, `set-buffer' also changes the selected buffer but it
> doesn't modify the buffer-list.
>
> `set-buffer' works differently than `switch-to-buffer' or
> `select-window'. As its documentation says, `set-buffer'
>
> ... does not display the buffer, so its effect ends
> when the current command terminates.
>
> This is in contrast with `switch-to-buffer' or `select-window'.
select-window does not "display the buffer" either.
> Moreover, as said in
>
> (elisp)The Buffer List
>
> The "buffer list" is a list of all live buffers. Creating a
> buffer adds it to this list, and killing a buffer excises it. The
> order of the buffers in the list is based primarily on how
> recently each buffer has been displayed in the selected window.
> Buffers move to the front of the list when they are selected and
> to the end when they are buried (see `bury-buffer', below).
> Several functions, notably `other-buffer', use this ordering. A
> buffer list displayed for the user also follows this order.
This only talks about events where the buffer displayed in a window
is changed rather than events where the selected window is changed.
Furthermore, select-window is not a command and in the case at hand, it
is used to *temporarily* switch to some other window.
> I did not deal with `select-window', but in my "Introduction to
> Programming in Emacs Lisp", I did explain the difference between
> `switch-to-buffer' and `set-buffer' like this:
I'm not comparing switch-to-buffer to set-buffer:
I'm comparing select-window to set-buffer.
I of course agree 100% with the current behavior which does not change
the buffer-list in set-buffer but changes it in switch-to-buffer.
OTOH, I still haven't heard any good reason why select-window should
fiddle with the buffer-list.
Stefan
- BUG: which-func-mode, Le Wang, 2003/03/04
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/10
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/11
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/11
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/13
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/14
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/16
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/16
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/03/16
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/03/17
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/18
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/16
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/17
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/17
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/17
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/19