[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BUG: which-func-mode
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: BUG: which-func-mode |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:30:06 -0500 |
> > Because it changes the selected buffer.
>
> I don't understand why one should imply the other.
> After all, `set-buffer' also changes the selected buffer but it doesn't
> modify the buffer-list.
>
> set-buffer only changes the current buffer; it doesn't change
> the selected buffer, which is the buffer that is displayed
> in the selected window.
Oh, I think I now understand the subtle difference. Thank you.
So now: how should we make it possible to temporarily select another
window without influencing the buffer-list ?
Stefan
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, (continued)
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/11
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/13
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/14
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/16
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/16
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/03/16
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/16
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/03/17
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/18
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/16
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/17
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/17
- Re: BUG: which-func-mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/19