[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message |
Date: |
11 Apr 2003 13:37:55 +0900 |
Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> > How about using an overlay with an `after-string' property, located at
> > the end of the minibuffer, for the minibuffer-message message itself?
> > Then there's no modification/insertion at all...
>
> Unfortunately, the cursor is shown after that `after-string'
> in that case.
Oh yeah, that address@hidden& problem -- I ran in the same thing when I was
trying
to do my `error messages don't obscure the users input' patch a long time
ago.
That behavior really should simply be fixed, it's stupid
(but unfortunately, not entirely trivial to fix either).
-Miles
--
"Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
you do it." Mahatma Ghandi
- Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/09
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/10
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/10
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Miles Bader, 2003/04/10
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/11
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message,
Miles Bader <=
- overlay property `after-string', Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/11
- Re: overlay property `after-string', Miles Bader, 2003/04/11
- Re: overlay property `after-string', Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/11
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/13
Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/10