[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc. |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 04:51:14 -0400 |
For example, we would use FRAME_COLS and FRAME_LINES rather than the
current FRAME_WIDTH and FRAME_HEIGHT.
I like this idea. The names are short and clear.
Handa wrote:
But, as I wrote, Lisp APIs are already using
...-width/...-height for columns and lines.
We don't HAVE to use the same convention internally as we do for Lisp.
It is true that it is better if the convention is the same, but that
has to be weighed against other advantages and disadvantages.
- Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kim F. Storm, 2003/04/09
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/09
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Miles Bader, 2003/04/09
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kim F. Storm, 2003/04/10
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/10
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kim F. Storm, 2003/04/10
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Miles Bader, 2003/04/10
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/10
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Richard Stallman, 2003/04/11
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/11
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc.,
Richard Stallman <=