[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
David Abrahams |
Subject: |
Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 07:43:59 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) XEmacs/21.4 (Native Windows TTY Support (Windows), cygwin32) |
Now that I've got your attention, I should qualify that. On Windows
XP using GNUs and talking to an IMAP server, it's way faster to use
XEmacs than to use Gnu Emacs. Nobody over on the GNUs list has a clue
as to why, but since they just work on elisp code they surmise it's
something in the emacs implementation. I know it's a long shot, but I
thought someone over here should know about it.
Cheers,
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
- Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs,
David Abrahams <=
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/24