[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:33:01 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:43:59AM -0400, David Abrahams wrote:
> Now that I've got your attention, I should qualify that. On Windows
> XP using GNUs and talking to an IMAP server, it's way faster to use
> XEmacs than to use Gnu Emacs. Nobody over on the GNUs list has a clue
> as to why, but since they just work on elisp code they surmise it's
> something in the emacs implementation.
Um, it might help if you actually said what operation is slower....
-Miles
--
"I distrust a research person who is always obviously busy on a task."
--Robert Frosch, VP, GM Research
- Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24