[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
David Abrahams |
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 06:37:28 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) XEmacs/21.4 (Native Windows TTY Support (Windows), cygwin32) |
"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: David Abrahams <address@hidden>
>> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:17:02 -0400
>>
>> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> >>>>>> "David" == David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
>> >
>> > David> Now that I've got your attention, I should qualify that.
>> > David> On Windows XP using GNUs and talking to an IMAP server,
>> > David> it's way faster to use XEmacs than to use Gnu Emacs.
>> >
>> > Which version of XEmacs?
>>
>> The very latest I could download a few days ago.
>
> Was that a Cygwin build or a native Windows build?
Native.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Ben Wing, 2003/04/25
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/22