[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8 |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:45:29 -0400 |
Could we add that information to the PROBLEMS file?
--- PROBLEMS.~1.147.~ Tue Feb 4 16:44:10 2003
+++ PROBLEMS Sat Apr 26 02:26:21 2003
@@ -27,6 +27,11 @@
mule-unicode-e000-ffff:-gnu-unifont-*-iso10646-1,\
mule-unicode-0100-24ff:-gnu-unifont-*-iso10646-1
+* Some Unicode characters are not supported.
+
+Emacs currently only supports the parts of the BMP whose codepoints
+are in the ranges 0000-33ff and e000-ffff.
+
Mentioning this in PROBLEMS seems like a good idea to me, but a useful
entry needs to be stated in terms of what behavior the user sees.
This text doesn't explain the practical consequences; a user would say
"so what does that mean for me?"
- More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/25
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/25
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/25
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/26
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/26
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/26
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/26
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/26
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/27
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/28
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Alex Schroeder, 2003/04/28
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/28
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/29