Re: skeleton.el _ versus @, a new patch

[Stefan Monnier]

>     A skeleton is basically a list.  Each element of the list is either a
>     string, a piece of lisp code, a sub-skeleton list or something to be
>     reinterpreted by skeleton-internal-1, basically anything that lisp
>     allows as a list member.  The only reason a bare - would occur in an
>     existing skeleton is if someone was using it as a variable name for some
>     obscure purpoose.  It is quite unlikely that any existing skeleton has
>     any bare -'s, the only use would be as parts of strings or character
>     constants using the usual lisp syntax for such.
> 
> In that case I see no harm in this change.  Stephan, would you like
> to install it?

I'm kind of away right now, so if someone else can do it, that would be best.


        Stefan