[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes in GNU ld. |
Date: |
Wed, 14 May 2003 20:39:56 -0500 (CDT) |
Kenichi Handa wrote:
I think this should be implemented by extending abbrev-mode
so that it can associate an abbreviation with multiple
words/phrases (is it possible already?)
I am not sure if I understand the last question correctly. If I do,
the answer is yes. (For instance, just give a numeric argument to
C-x a g or C-x a l.) On the other hand, only word-constituent characters
can be part of the abbrev itself.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes in GNU ld., Hin-Tak Leung, 2003/05/14
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes in GNU ld., Jason Rumney, 2003/05/14
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes in GNU ld., Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/14
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes in GNU ld., Kenichi Handa, 2003/05/14
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes in GNU ld.,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, Hin-Tak Leung, 2003/05/14
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, Hin-Tak Leung, 2003/05/15
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/05/15
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, Hin-Tak Leung, 2003/05/15
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/05/15
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/05/16
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, Hin-Tak Leung, 2003/05/16
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/05/17
- Re: a few MULE criticisms, Hin-Tak Leung, 2003/05/17
Re: a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes in GNU ld., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/05/15