[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour
From: |
John Paul Wallington |
Subject: |
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour |
Date: |
Tue, 20 May 2003 21:59:26 +0100 |
> Currently, zap-to-char deletes every character up to
> a given character and including the said character.
> Does this behaviour satisfy most people?
>
> I personaly have rarely seen the need for removing
> this last character: usually, I want to remove
> characters up to a closing parenthesis or a semicolon
> for instance.
I don`t personally use `zap-to-char', so I don't know whether
killing up to and including char is a better default.
In the sources the code to avoid zapping said char is commented out.
How about having a seperate `zap-up-to-char' command ?