Re: Zap-to-char behaviour

[David Kastrup]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>       Currently, zap-to-char deletes every character up to
>       a given character and including the said character.
>       Does this behaviour satisfy most people?
> 
> It seems useful to me.  It means you can repeat the
> command and it isn't a no-op.

Well, if that was the main rationale, it would be easy enough just to
make sure that one deletes at least one character: namely ignore the
immediately following character when finding the next one to zap to.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum