[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour |
Date: |
Wed, 21 May 2003 16:58:05 -0500 (CDT) |
Ehud Karni wrote:
If you want a consistent function I propose the following:
Your function seems indeed to be an improvement.
My personal opinion is that `zap-to-char' is good enough for me and
I don't need this one,
I do not personally see the need for zap-up-to-char either, because it
is so easy to retype the character that M-z already prompted for.
However, if your usage is such that you know that you *never* will
want to erase the character, then rebinding M-z to zap-up-to-char
might be useful.
Sincerely,
Luc.
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Jérôme Marant, 2003/05/22