[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MML charset tag regression
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: MML charset tag regression |
Date: |
Thu, 22 May 2003 09:58:22 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, "Jan D." <address@hidden> writes:
> I do not understand the issues involved in detail, I do not know what
> we need and why. In my naive reasoning, Emacs would be fine if it
> requested UTF8_STRING first and COMPOUND_TEXT second always. This is
> what the free desktop documents seems to recommend. Or prehaps request
> TARGETS first to check for UTF8_STRING, and use that if available and
> something else if not (COMPOUND_STRING, STRING or TEXT in that order?).
The current Emacs still don't unify Unicode and the other
legacy charsets (e.g. iso-8859-2, jisx0208, gb2312)
automatically. So, for instance, if iso-8859-2 characters
arrive at Emacs with UTF8_STRING, they are decoded into the
charset mule-unicode-0100-24ff and treated differently
(e.g. in searching) than the characters of the charset
iso-8859-2.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Kenichi Handa, 2003/05/20
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Jan D., 2003/05/20
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/21
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/23
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Jan D., 2003/05/23
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Miles Bader, 2003/05/23
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Dave Love, 2003/05/25
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/25
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Dave Love, 2003/05/25
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/05/25