Re: sortcar and sort-subr

[David Kastrup]

"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:

> While adding a `predicate' argument to sort-subr, I noticed that
> it uses a `sortcar' function (if fboundp) that I've never heard
> of and that doesn't exist and seems never to have existed.

Probably some remniscent of dynamic binding: use something like
(flet ((softcar some-function)) (sort-subr ...

> Any objection to removing it (and adding a `predicate' argument for
> when your keys can't conveniently be numbers or strings) ?

Perhaps do a grep through other sources first to make sure it is
never used in that (ugly) manner.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum