Re: MML charset tag regression

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:

> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>>  So, for instance, if iso-8859-2 characters arrive at
>> Emacs with UTF8_STRING, they are decoded into the charset
>> mule-unicode-0100-24ff and treated differently (e.g. in
>> searching) than the characters of the charset iso-8859-2.

> That's actually customizable if it's a real problem.

Currently, even if we customize utf-fragment-on-decoding to
t, iso-8859-2 chars encoded in utf-8 can't be decoded into
latin-iso8859-2 charset because utf-fragmentation-table
contain only Greek and Cyrillic chars.

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden