[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?
From: |
David Masterson |
Subject: |
Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls? |
Date: |
05 Jun 2003 10:11:29 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
>>>>> Robin Hu writes:
> Current CVS NtEmacs snapshot loads libjpeg.dll in runtime. This
> causes a problem while I have some different versions of
> libjpeg.dll in %PATH%, because these versions are not binary
> compatible. And this problems can not be easily get rid of,
> because NtEmacs tries to load this dll via several names, such as
> libjpeg.dll jpeg-62.dll. We are in the hell of dlls now.
Can this be solved by simply wrapping NtEmacs in a BAT script that
adjusts the %PATH% before calling NtEmacs?
--
David Masterson David DOT Masterson AT synopsys DOT com
Sr. R&D Engineer Synopsys, Inc.
Software Engineering Sunnyvale, CA
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, (continued)
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Jason Rumney, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Robin Hu, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Jason Rumney, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Jason Rumney, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/06/05
Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?,
David Masterson <=