Re: [Fwd: [arch-users] Re: Gud lord!]

[Stefan Monnier]

> > [3]  which _does_ offer a CVS->SVN conversion tool....
> Such notions of "archive conversion" are deeply ill-conceived, IMO.  I
> see no compelling reason to "fake" development history and many reasons
> not to.

Remember the original post your responded to ?
The one where I complained that the problem with moving files
in CVS is that getting the past history becomes painful ?


        Stefan