[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question) |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:12:12 -0400 |
Well, other than the fact that fundamental-mode is interactive,
it is basically an alias for kill-all-local-variables, so the
coding-convention that says that a major mode should start by calling
kill-all-local-variables is pretty much the same as saying that
every major mode should derive from fundamental-mode.
I see your point, but I think it is useful to keep the distinction
between major modes that are independent and those that really
are derived from others.
- Re: Emacs design question (was: run-mode-hooks), (continued)
- Re: Emacs design question (was: run-mode-hooks), Richard Stallman, 2003/07/20
- define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Stefan Monnier, 2003/07/21
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Miles Bader, 2003/07/22
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Richard Stallman, 2003/07/23
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Miles Bader, 2003/07/23
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Stefan Monnier, 2003/07/23
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Miles Bader, 2003/07/23
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Richard Stallman, 2003/07/25
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Richard Stallman, 2003/07/24
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question), Richard Stallman, 2003/07/24
- Re: define-derived-mode again (was: Emacs design question),
Richard Stallman <=