Re: A plea for dynamically loadable extension modules

[Paul Jarc]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
>     Emacs could use the same exception in its license that Guile
>     uses.
>
> That sort of exception is similar to use of the LGPL.

(I wonder why Guile doesn't simply use the LGPL, then.)  But aren't
there plans to make Emacs based on Guile with an elisp translator?
Then Emacs will get the exception (and the dynamic extension
capability) anyway, won't it?


paul