[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: desktop
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: desktop |
Date: |
18 Aug 2003 19:05:48 +0900 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Is there any situation in which the user benefits from
> having desktop-enable be nil? Do users want that mode of
> operation? If not, we could just make desktop-enable t by default.
> Why not?
Because then desktop keeps asking annoying questions?
I really don't know anything about desktop, but for some reason I set
`desktop-enable' to t at some point.
Then emacs started asking questions when I exited -- `Save desktop?' `Where?'
etc.
I don't want to answer questions when I exit, I just want to exit, and I
presume most users are the same -- _especially_ if it's for a feature
that they didn't enable explicitly.
Maybe there's something screwed up with my system, I don't know.
If desktop did something useful without being annoying I suppose it
could be turned on by default.
-Miles
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
- desktop, Alex Schroeder, 2003/08/15
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/16
- Re: desktop and misc.texi, Alex Schroeder, 2003/08/16
- Re: desktop, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/18
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/18
- Re: desktop,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: desktop, Alex Schroeder, 2003/08/18
- Re: desktop, Miles Bader, 2003/08/19
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/19
- Re: desktop, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/20
- Message not available
- Re: desktop, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/21
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/22
- Re: desktop, Alex Schroeder, 2003/08/22
- Re: desktop, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/23
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/24
- Re: desktop, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/23