|
From: | Kevin Rodgers |
Subject: | Re: cc-langs.el |
Date: | Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:49:39 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020406 Netscape6/6.2.2 |
Richard Stallman wrote:
> To concretize the discussion, I think the following functions are > generally useful and haven't got any direct counterparts in the > current set: > > Sorry, that is far too much. For what reason? The work of updating the manual? I don't even want to think about that many different functions, sorry.
Martin's list has 82 functions. In comparison, lisp/files.el defines 83 functions, lisp/simple.el defines 152 function, and src/*.c defines 1,058 (Lisp) functions. The Common Lisp functions have a well-specified interface, and adding new functions (vs. modifying existing functions) should not affect Emacs' behavior. What's to think about? -- Kevin Rodgers
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |