[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug |
Date: |
16 Oct 2003 05:40:22 -0400 |
"Alexander Pohoyda" <address@hidden> writes:
That's what I'm trying to hear in this discussion. Can't we just
hide header fields instead of creating another "simplified" header in
between of the message and thus braking it?
you have the right idea. hiding is the desired functionality, and
currently, deleting is the implementation. it's probably ok to keep the
functionality and choose a more desirable implementation (overlays, for
example). then when someone complains about the change breaking their
code you can say "that was an implementation detail". then, they will
of course ask you for your high-level design and API, in order to avoid
being burned in the future. then, you will know you have thought about
things in the right way from the beginning.
thi
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/12
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Kenichi Handa, 2003/10/13
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, David Kastrup, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16