[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:58:28 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: 16 Oct 2003 14:49:13 -0400
>
> I need to be able to forward/resend a GPG-signed message (or a message with
> a GPG-signed subpart), so at least in those cases we need to preserve all
> the information.
Is forwarding such a frequent operation?
> PS: All the MUAs I know do the processing upon display, so I don't
> understand why it would pose any performance problem.
It simply sounds sub-optimal to do the decoding every time the message
is displayed.
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/16
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Simon Josefsson, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/21
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2003/10/21
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/22
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/22