[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:20:41 -0400 |
> Would I even found them at the beginning, I would not dare to use the
> one from Gnus, because:
> * it belongs to different project in my eyes.
> * gnus/qp.el requires mm-util, which I neither need nor want right now.
I think a better solution than writing yet another implementation
would be to move gnus/qp.el to mime/qp.el,
We already have functions to do this in mailutils, so we
should standardize on those, unless the other set has some
advantage that would be an argument for preferring them.
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, (continued)
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Satyaki Das, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/18
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/18
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/19
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alex Schroeder, 2003/10/19
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/19
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/20
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Kenichi Handa, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Peter S Galbraith, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/17