[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change of C indentation style ('{')
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Change of C indentation style ('{') |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:24:39 -0400 |
That's because CC Mode analyzes the braces differently now. It marks
them as defun-open and defun-close instead of substatement-open and
substatement-close. That is because FOR_EACH_FRAME isn't recognized as
a substatement introducing keyword, and barring macro oddities
everything else has to be function definitions.
I'm not sure what to do about it.
You could perhaps undo the change.
There are other cases when this new
heuristic is useful, e.g. for functions in macro arguments or gcc
nested functions.
could you show us the cases in question?
if we can't make them all work rt, we should choose the case
more useful in practice and make it wrk rt.
or there cd in theory be some convention used to say which way to do it.
- Change of C indentation style ('{'), Kenichi Handa, 2003/10/22
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Martin Stjernholm, 2003/10/23
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Martin Stjernholm, 2003/10/25
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Richard Stallman, 2003/10/27
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Martin Stjernholm, 2003/10/27
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Richard Stallman, 2003/10/28
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Martin Stjernholm, 2003/10/29
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Miles Bader, 2003/10/29
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Martin Stjernholm, 2003/10/29
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Miles Bader, 2003/10/29
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/29
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Richard Stallman, 2003/10/30