[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock
|
From: |
Alexander Pohoyda |
|
Subject: |
Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock |
|
Date: |
25 Oct 2003 09:35:20 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Hrvoje Niksic <address@hidden> writes:
> > Yes, both cases work. If I comment out (font-lock-mode 1), things
> > still work.
>
> Please repeat the tests with `emacs -q' then.
OK. There is no difference whether the buffer is named "*foo*" or just
"foo". Both cases work.
If I comment out (font-lock-mode 1), both cases does not work: a
string is not fontified.
--
Alexander Pohoyda <address@hidden>
PGP Key fingerprint: 7F C9 CC 5A 75 CD 89 72 15 54 5F 62 20 23 C6 44
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/23
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Hrvoje Niksic, 2003/10/23
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/24
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Hrvoje Niksic, 2003/10/24
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/24
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Hrvoje Niksic, 2003/10/24
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock,
Alexander Pohoyda <=
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Hrvoje Niksic, 2003/10/25
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/26
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Hrvoje Niksic, 2003/10/26
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/26
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/27
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/28