Re: Incomplete output from "cvs annotate"

[Andreas Schwab]

Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:

> Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> IMHO, it shouldn't.  If the data need to be collapsed into the same
>>> buffer, it should happen inside Emacs, not by cloning the fd.  So using
>>> a BUFFER cons cell in VC for call-process isn't a solution, using just
>>> one BUFFER should work.
>>
>> This is what VC is doing.
>
> So what's the problem?  If VC is using a cons cell,

I think you misunderstood me, VC is using a single buffer for both
stdout and stderr, which is why the bug occurs.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."