emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FAQ: gnuplot vs. emacs' compile command


From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: FAQ: gnuplot vs. emacs' compile command
Date: 12 Feb 2004 14:34:11 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50

> Did anyone actually look at this bug back in May ?
> FYI, I have included the text at the referenced link here.

What is the bug exactly?
My understanding is of the problem:
when Emacs exits, gnuplot is killed because its stdout is connected to
Emacs (i.e. it receives a SIGPIPE or SIGHUP or somesuch).


        Stefan


> Dan Jacobson <address@hidden> writes:

>> Fellas, the gnuplot team may have found ugly emacs process bugs, see
>> <...>
>> 

> : Dan Jacobson <address@hidden> wrote:
> : 
> : > Using emacs -eval '(compile "make")'
> : > With: echo "plot 'file';pause -1"|gnuplot -persist
> : > just flashes the graph for a split second.
> : 
> : So let's get into dissecting this further.  The first candidate to
> : remove is 'make'.  It doesn't really do anything useful in this whole
> : setup, so we might as well get rid of it.  Let's replace it by a shell
> : script doing the same things.  And while at it, let's get rid of the
> : separate data file, too:
> : 
> : --- gpaction ---
> : gnuplot -persist <<EOS
> :  plot '-'
> :    1 1
> :    2 2
> :   e
> : EOS
> : ---- end ---
> : 
> : sh gpaction                                 # does the plot and returns
> : emacs -eval '(compile "sh gpaction")'       # doesn't plot, but returns
> : emacs -eval '(shell-command "sh gpaction")' # plot, but no return
> : 
> : For the latter, emacs is unresponsive --- it's obviously waiting for
> : something to happen, which doesn't.  Only after you terminate the
> : gnuplot graph window (key 'q' into it), or press Ctrl-G in emacs to
> : forcibly break out of the wait loop, it will continue.
> : 
> : During that pause, look at the output from 'ps jx' and you'll find
> : that gnuplot_x11 is an orphan --- i.e. it's the only surviving process
> : in its process group.  In "shell-command", emacs apparently doesn't
> : kill it, whereas in "compile", it probably does.
> : -- 
> : Hans-Bernhard Broeker (address@hidden)
> : Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

> -- 
> Kim F. Storm  http://www.cua.dk



> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]