Re: last-abbrev-location

[Luc Teirlinck]

>From my previous message:

   Unlike `abbrev-start-location', which is a marker,
   `last-abbrev-location' is just a buffer position, an integer.  Is
   there a reason for this?  It seems to cause problems.

Maybe, on second thought, it might give compatibility problems if one
tried to change this now.  Maybe `unexpand-abbrev' is only intended to
be used after having typed a few extra characters _after_ the epanded
abbrev, in which case the problems described in my previous message do
not occur.  Maybe the only problem is that its docstring does not make
that sufficiently clear.

Sincerely,

Luc.