emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More enhancements to fringe bitmaps.


From: Marc Munari 16473.4929
Subject: Re: More enhancements to fringe bitmaps.
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:08:37 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (berkeley-unix)

~\/~ "Miles" == Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

     > address@hidden (Marco Munari 16447.64651) writes:
on Mar 9  and  on Mar 11
     > i'm introducing new fringe *active* basic face,
     > (FRINGE_ACTIVE_FACE_ID as new and complement of FRINGE_FACE_ID)
     > to permit more hilighting of current selected window, because
     > mod_line_inactive_face_id and mode_line_face_id highlight the
     > selected emacs window only in the bottom (of the void space)
     > below the buffer.


Miles> If you are answering my previous question,

No, the list in the past had problem and i rely suggestion
to resend messages if they don't appare for long time. I did,
even tryng to set (unsuccesfully) the same message-id.
But after, the message appare twice.

Miles> I think you didn't quite understand what I meant:

i'm sorry, it is not the case.

Miles> Why did you use: `fringe-active' and `fringe' instead of:
Miles> `fringe' and `fringe-inactive'
Miles> To highlight the selected-window/other-windows?
Miles> The latter is more consistent with existing practice.

since the beginning i noticed an existing practice related
to mode-line-inactive (are there any other similar cases?),
before and in conjunction to your first reply.

Miles> [There may very well be a good reason,


Miles> I simply don't know what it is.]

Miles> -Miles --  Run away!  Run away!

I'm not in a hurry, are you (the patch is not in cvs)? (some
other one ask me to sign papers insted of discuss the content,
i didn't ignore your message in my mind (and i immediately
prepared a draft of a reply), but i prefered to send
less "not well definde mail" as possible. I'm sorry if this
was not what you expect, now you have the draft with reasons
(expressed as my opinion) why i don't choosed ...-inactive
variable name, in my reply with _your_ message-id in
References field. I repeat here that i will send a new patch
related to base cvs emacs.

Saluti,
MARco
-- 
x(t),y(t) = th(3t-34.5)*e^[-(3t-34.5)^2]/2-4.3+e^(-1.8/t^2)/(.8*atg(t-
3)+2)(t-1.8)-.3th(5t-42.5),(1.4e^[-(3t-34.5)^2]+1-sgn[|t-8.5|-.5]*1.5*
|sin(pi*t)|^[2e^(-(t-11.5)^2)+.5+e^(-(.6t-3.3)^2)])/(.5+t)+1  ; 0<t<14





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]