[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
26 Mar 2004 01:19:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> >> Second, it is unlikely that new Emacs user, or even
> >> experienced one seldom uses this keybinding. I have yet to
> >> find use for this functionality (= never used in my Emacs
> >> lifetime).
>
> > My $0.02: I use it whenever I use Enriched Text mode.
>
> So you mean that the current M-g binding should be moved from global-map to
> enriched-mode-map ? Agreed.
The current M-g bindings are:
M-g d facemenu-set-default
M-g b facemenu-set-bold
M-g i facemenu-set-italic
M-g l facemenu-set-bold-italic
M-g u facemenu-set-underline
M-g o facemenu-set-face
What if enriched mode had these (equally logical) bindings instead:
C-c C-d facemenu-set-default
C-c C-b facemenu-set-bold
C-c C-i facemenu-set-italic
C-c C-l facemenu-set-bold-italic
C-c C-u facemenu-set-underline
C-c C-o facemenu-set-face
(and C-c d, C-c b, etc as well).
If other modes would like to use these bindings as well, it could be
a separate minor mode, e.g. enriched-face-mode, that could be enabled
by enriched mode by default.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Lucas, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.linux, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25