Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line

[David Kastrup]

Jari Aalto <address@hidden> writes:

> * 2004-03-26 David Kastrup <dak <AT> gnu.org> mail.default.spool
> | jari.aalto <AT> poboxes.com (Jari Aalto+mail.linux) writes:
> | 
> | > * 2004-03-25 no-spam <AT> cua.dk (Kim Storm) gmane.emacs.devel
> | > * <http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&address@hidden>
> | >
> | > | C-x c c => compile
> | > | C-x c r => recompile
> | > | C-x c n => next error
> | > | C-x c p => prev error
> | > | C-x c g => grep
> | > | 
> | > 
> | > Excellent idea
> | 
> | Since C-x c is too close to C-x C-c, how about mixing the proposals
> | into an easily accessable binding?
> | 
> | C-c C-c C-c => compile
> | C-c C-c C-r => recompile
> | C-c C-c C-n => next error
> | C-c C-c C-p => previous error
> | C-c C-c Uhh... do we really need a case for grep?
> 
> Really, if there are any more C-c C- C- C- key combinations, my hand
> will retire soon. The first proposal of "C-c c" prefix is much more
> friendly to wrists.

I can't remember any such proposal, and it would not go through,
anyway, since C-c letter combinations are reserved for the user.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum