[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
|
Date: |
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 00:52:24 -0500 |
I want Emacs to move in the direction of doing word processing. It
may take years, but we will get there. Then commands to specify faces
will become important, and will need a good key binding.
I chose the M-g binding for that reason, and the reason continues to
have force. So I don't intend to change that binding.
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/28