Re: [PATCH] unexec() for Cygwin port

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: 29 Mar 2004 16:10:02 -0500
> 
> The macosx code also spits lots of "debug" output when dumping
> and noone has complained about it.  I don't see any problem with that.

I was under the impression that some printf's are really left-overs;
in particular, some of them there are in the normal execution path,
i.e. when there's no failure in sight.  Perhaps you should take a look
at the code yourself.

It is IMHO also advisable to figure out which of these printf's should
really be converted into calls to `abort', since in some grave cases,
a mere printf wouldn't give enough info to debug the problem.

> Especially during pretest.

What pretest?